Campagnolo
is the only component maker capable of
supplying all of a bicycle's drivetrain components, from
pedals to rims. In this edition of Tech Talk, Tim Laflin
examines Campy's updated '98 rim lineup. (We also have
Tim's exclusive review of Campagnolo's
'98 wheelsets.)
Guide to the Rims
Atlanta
| Barcelona
| Montreal
| Mexico/Moskva
| Berlin
| Sydney
Rims
What can I say about rims? Well this year Campy
has cut the pork and addressed some key issues that I had
with the old rims. The first big issue that really
confused me was the shear number of different rims that
seemed to overlap.
There are two major types of rims. There are
tubulars and clinchers. Most of the world rides on
clinchers due to the expense of tubular tires and the
pain involved in acutally fixing a tubular. To this end
Campy has taken a bit radical approach this year: It will
offer one rim choice to the tubular tire buyer. An array
of six different rims are
available to the clincher buyer. In all reality this is
probably the best for all concerned.
The rims for this year are of the same high
quality you expect from Campy, but in the last two years
two major improvments have been brought to market. Campy
is now going to offer what it calls SWT or side wall
treatment. Mavic has been doing this for quite some time
and it drives up the rim price to the point that not many
of the competitors have been willing to follow. The
second improvment is the HPB or high performance braking
control surface. All of the rims in the line receive one
or the other.
There are a few ways to make rims that works well.
The cheapest way was to take a single wall extrusion and
weld the seam and grind it back flat. The drawbacks to
this product were many. The first was that the spoke
nipples had to be shielded from the innertube. The second
was the rim lacked side to side stiffness. All this
changed when the dual wall rim was invented. The second
wall allowed for two improvments. The innertube could now
ride higher, above the spoke nipples, so flats were much
less common from the nipples sharp edges or long spokes
poking through the tube. In the single wall design the
only thing that protected the tube was a strip of
sacraficial rubber over the heads of the nipples. The
second benefit was a much stronger rim. The rim now had
an enclosed box section to increase rigidity.
All Campy rims are at least dual wall
construction. I want to make a short statement of the two
types of construction for Campy rims. The HPW rims are
joined rims with an insert that gets rivited into place
to hold the rim together. This style of rim has
historically had a very noticable seam during braking. I
will give Campy credit that they are the best in the
industry with this technique, but I have been spoiled
with the SWT machined side wall that is without seams.
The SWT rim is welded at the joint in the rim and then
machined to the correct dimension without the need for
the joining insert like the HPW. The HPW side wall
treatment is better in durability and braking performance
(especially in the wet). The call as to which to pick
will be more of a choice of the conditions you ride in.
If you live in England and you have a lot of rain the
choice is easliy HPW. If you live in Phenoix, Arizona I
would probably go with the smoother-braking SWT.
Atlanta
This is the top of the line wind cheater from
Campy. The rim weight is a hefty 590 grams. The width
if the rim is a thin 19mm and the aero depth is 34mm.
This rim is targeted for the time trial or lone rider
that is willing to run a skinny sub 23mm tire. You
can run any tire you like, but a 20 or 19mm tire will
not leave the rim peaking out to plow throught the
wind like a wider rim. If you are riding as a single
for timed events this may be your rim. The draw backs
are the cross wind characteristics are not very good
and the ride can be harsh with narrow tires. The
benefits are lower wind drag. The rims comes in a
single color which is a high polished aluminum with
HPW side walls.
Barcelona
This is the lone tubular rim in the line. It
is the lightest rim at 410 grams. Campy is offering
this box cross section rim with a wide 22mm tire area
and a very thin 11.6mm height. This is the perfect
choice for the climber, sprinter or crit rider. If
you are riding tubulars, then weight and ride quality
are a big issue. This rim has no aero profile. What
it does have is excelent crosswind stability (good
for group rides so you don't sail across the road in
a gust of wind), lateral rigidity (stiff for the
sprints), and low mass for good acceleration. Like
all Campy eyelet rims this one has stainless steel
eyelets. Yeah, big deal! If you are a gram head and
want to use alloy nipples the eyelets are they way to
go. An eyelet rim will allow the nipples to spin
easily without cutting into the nipple. The rims
witout eyelets tend to cut into the nipple and break
the nipples, plus they are harder to get up to proper
tension without rounding the nipples. The side walls
are SWT and the color is dark anodized aluminum.
Montreal
This is the clincher version of the Barcelona
in a way. The width of the Montreal is 19mm with a
16.6mm depth. It is a box section rim with stainless
eyelets. At 415 grams it is the lighest clincher
Campy makes. The things to not here are the SWT side
walls and the narrow width. This is a rim that is
designed for a lighter rider or somebody that is easy
on the equipment. It makes a good all around front,
but heavier riders will untrue in the back faster
than some of the heavier rims. The narrow width of
the rim will decrase the full effect of the dual
pivot braking in geometry slightly. The finish for
the Montreal is dark annodized only.
Mexico and Moskva
Both of these rims are very similar. It is the
cross over rim for Campy. It is not aero and not box
section. The Mexico is slightly deeper in aero
profile by 1.6mm. Both rims are 20mm wide. The Mexico
is 485 grams compared to the Moskva's 435 grams. I
guess Campy could not decide which one to kill. The
wall thickness on both rims is roughly equivalent,
but the Mexico unbuilt is a little stiffer. If you
are a heavier rider the Mexico may make sense. Last
year the staple rim for most of my building was the
Moskva and it received very few complaints. Either
rim is good and the ligher Moskva was a better choice
for the gram concious consumer. These rims have a
better aero profile than the box section rims, but do
not suffer from cross winds like thea Atlanta and
Sydney. It is some of both worlds. Both rims are the
HPW construction. The one caution I will make is that
new brake pads have little contact area to these rims
due to the curvature. It will take several miles to
ware the pads to match. Mexico comes in a single
finish of a satin aluminum. The Moskva comes in a
titanium finish which looks cool on light colored
bikes and Ti bikes.
Berlin
This is the heavy duty rim in the Campy line
up. At 535 grams in an almost box section it is
designed for the hard roads and heavy loads. Not only
does it use a dual wall construction, but it also
gets reinforcement from added corner braces in the
second wall. It carries stainless eyelets for easy
turing and long life. It has SWT side walls with a
satin finish. The rim is a more or less standard 20mm
wide and 18 mm deep. This makes a decent wheel for
tandem use and rear wheels for big riders.
Sydney
This is the Atlanta with new SWT side walls.
It is 19 mm wide with a 30mm deep aero section. It is
not as aero as the Atlanta and it is 37 grams lighter
at 553 grams. Take your pick based on the SWT versus
HPW recommendations above. All of the comments for
the Atlanta are valid for the Sydney. The Atlanta is
a little more aero in shape and a little deeper, but
the bottom line is both rims are targeted at the same
purpose. The Sydney comes in a satin aluminum.
That is it for the Campy rims this year! The
choice is simple now. Last year the all the rims came in
3 colors and there were more of them. This year picking a
Campy rim has never been easier and the new SWT means you
do not have to go to Mavic to get the smooth braking. You
still have a choice of HPW for bad weather. Unless
stainless steel eyelets are mention in the rim
discription the rims do not have eyelets.
|